The Struggle for Existence in Human Society (1. The Struggle for Existence in Human Society (1. Collected Essays IX. If. we confine our attention to that aspect which engages the attention of the intellect, nature appears a beautiful and harmonious whole, the incarnation of a faultless logical process, from certain. But if it be regarded from a less elevated, though more human, point of view; if our moral sympathies are allowed to influence our. The Struggle for Existence in Human Society (1888. In 1775 Kant visualised inner and outer struggle as the impetus for man passing from a rude state of nature to a citizen. Rather than a struggle for existence, a mutual struggle and mutual aid drives natural selection. In other words, the nature and the distribution of refuges would constitute an integral part of the expressions f 1 (N 1, N. On the Origin of Species (or more completely, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life), published on 24 November 1859, is a work of scientific. In sober truth, to those who have made a . It is really only. God in their own image, find no difficulty in assuming that the Almighty must have. They are quite sure that, had any other course been practicable, He would no more have made infinite suffering a necessary ingredient of His handiwork. But even the modified optimism of the time- honoured thesis of physico- theology, that the sentient world is, on the whole, regulated by principles of benevolence, does but ill stand. No doubt it is quite true that sentient nature affords hosts of examples of subtle contrivances directed towards the production of. But if so, why is it not equally proper to say of the equally numerous arrangements, the no. If a vast amount of that which, in a piece of human workmanship, we should call skill, is . Viewed under the. But the fact. that the deer suffers, while the wolf inflicts suffering, engages our moral sympathies. We should call men like the deer innocent and good, men such as the wolf malignant and bad; we should call. Surely, if we transfer these judgments to nature outside. In that case, the goodness of the right hand which helps the deer, and the wickedness of the left hand which eggs on the wolf, will neutralize one. This conclusion is thrust upon us by analogous facts in every part of the sentient world; yet, inasmuch as it not only jars upon prevalent prejudices, but arouses the natural. But. how this compensation is to be effected, in the case of the great majority of sentient things, is not clear. I apprehend that no one is seriously prepared to maintain that the ghosts of all the. For the carnivores, however brutal and sanguinary, have only done that which, if there is any. Moreover, carnivores and herbivores alike have been subject to all the miseries incidental to old age, disease, and. There would be something in. And, again, it is an error to imagine that evolution signifies a constant tendency to increased perfection. That. process undoubtedly involves a constant remodelling of the organism in adaptation to new conditions; but it depends on the nature of those conditions whether the direction of the modifications. Retrogressive is as practicable as progressive metamorphosis. If what the physical philosophers tell us, that our globe has been in a state of fusion, and, like. Diatom of the arctic and antarctic ice and the Protococcus of the red snow. If our globe is proceeding from a condition in which it was too hot to support any but the lowest living. BULMAN, in NATURE of January 22, urges that what is good for the individual or race will survive unaided. But surely this is contrary to well-known facts. Man, with the increase of specialisation, which (whether it be an.The creatures are fairly well treated, and set to. The spectator has no need to turn his thumbs down, as no quarter is given. He must admit that the skill. But he must shut his eyes if he would not see that more or less enduring suffering is the meed of both vanquished and victor. And since the great game is going. Her terrible aspect is not to be ignored. If the optimism of Leibnitz is a foolish though pleasant dream, the pessimism of Schopenhauer is a nightmare, the more foolish because of its. Streaming resources for The Nature Man: Or, The Struggle for Existence. Links to watch this USA Documentary Movie online. Error which is not pleasant is surely the worst form of wrong. A worn- out voluptuary may find nothing good under the sun, or a. If each and all of us had been visited by an. Men with any manhood in them find life quite worth living under worse conditions than these. A vast multitude of. To those who experience them, few delights can be more . Pessimism is as little consonant with the facts of sentient. If we desire to represent the course of nature in terms of human thought, and assume that it was intended to be that which it is, we must say that its governing principle is. That the rain falls alike upon the just and the unjust, and that those upon whom the Tower of Siloam fell were no worse than their neighbours, seem to be Oriental modes of expressing the same. But it is convenient to distinguish those parts of nature in which man plays the part of. It is the more desirable, and even necessary, to make this. The latter fights out the. In the cycle of phenomena presented by the life of man, the animal, no more moral end is discernible than in that presented by the lives of the wolf and of the deer. However. imperfect the relics of prehistoric men may be, the evidence which they afford clearly tends to the conclusion that, for thousands and thousands of years, before the origin of the oldest known. They strove with their enemies and their competitors; they preyed upon things weaker or less cunning than themselves; they were born, multiplied. Life was a continual free fight, and beyond the limited and temporary relations of the family, the Hobbesian war of each against all was the normal. The human species, like others, plashed and floundered amid the general stream of evolution, keeping its head above water as it best might, and thinking neither of whence nor. The history of civilization–that is, of society–on the other hand, is the record of the attempts which the human race has made to escape from this position. The first men. who substituted the state of mutual peace for that of mutual war, whatever the motive which impelled them to take that step, created society. But, in establishing peace, they obviously put a limit. Between the members of that society, at any rate, it was not to be pursued a outrance. And of all the successive shapes which society has taken, that most. On the contrary, the ideal of the ethical. Peace is both end and means with him; and he founds his life on a more or less complete self- restraint, which is the negation of the unlimited struggle for existence. He tries to escape from. Man, governed upon tile principle of moral evolution. For. society not only has a moral end, but in its perfection, social life, is embodied morality. One of the most essential conditions, if not the chief cause, of the struggle for existence, is the tendency to multiply without limit, which man shares with all living. But, in civilized society, the inevitable result of such obedience is the re- establishment, in all its intensity, of that struggle for. It is conceivable that, at some period in the history of the fabled Atlantis, the production of food should have been exactly sufficient to meet the wants of the population. And, as there is no harm in adding another monstrous. In that happy land, the natural. There would have been no competition, but the industry of each would have been serviceable to all; nobody being vain and nobody avaricious. But it is obvious that this state of things could have been. Add ten fresh mouths; and as, by the supposition, there was . The Atlantis society. Reckless Istar, non- moral Nature, would have riven the. I was once talking with a very eminent physician. Historians point to the greed and ambition of rulers, to the reckless turbulence of the ruled, to the debasing effects of wealth and. No doubt immoral motives of all sorts have figured largely among the minor . But beneath all this superficial turmoil lay the deep- seated impulse given. In the swarms of colonies thrown out by Phoenicia and by old Greece; in the ver sacrum of the Latin races; in the floods of Gauls and of Teutons which burst over. Europe; in the swaying to and fro of the vast Mongolian hordes in late times, the population problem comes to the front in a very visible shape. Nor is it. less plainly manifest in the everlasting agrarian questions of ancient Rome than in the Arreoi societies of the Polynesian Islands. In the ancient world, and in a large part of that in which we live, the practice of infanticide was, or is, a regular and legal custom; famine, pestilence, and war were and are. But, in the more advanced civilizations, the progress of private and public morality has steadily tended to remove all these checks. We declare infanticide murder, and punish it. In their moments of expansion, even statesmen and men of business go thus far. The finer spirits look to an ideal civitas Dei; a state when, every man having reached. Whether human nature is competent, under any circumstances, to reach, or even seriously advance towards, this ideal condition, is a question which need not be discussed. It will be. admitted that mankind has not yet reached this stage by a very long way, and my business is with the present. And that which I wish to point out is that, so long as the natural man increases and. If. Istar is to reign on the one hand, she will demand her human sacrifices on the other. For seventy years peace and industry have had their way among us with less interruption and under more favourable conditions than in any other country. The wealth of Croesus was nothing to that which we have accumulated, and our prosperity has filled the world with envy. But Nemesis did not forget Croesus: has she. I think not. There are now 3. That is to say, about every hundred seconds, or so, a new claimant to a share in the common stock or maintenance presents him or herself among us. At the present time, the produce of the soil does. The other moiety has to be supplied with food which must be bought from the people of food- producing countries. That is to say, we have to offer them the. And the things they want and which we can produce better than they can are mainly manufactures–industrial products. The insolent reproach of the first Napoleon had a very solid foundation. We not only are, but, under penalty of starvation, we are bound to be, a nation of shopkeepers. But other. Judged by an ethical standard, nothing can be less satisfactory than the position in which we find ourselves.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |